🔗 Share this article

Throughout the initial chapters of the publication Authentic, speaker the author raises a critical point: typical advice to “bring your true self” or “show up completely genuine at work” are far from well-meaning invitations for individuality – they can be pitfalls. Burey’s debut book – a blend of memoir, research, societal analysis and interviews – attempts to expose how companies take over individual identity, moving the responsibility of organizational transformation on to staff members who are frequently at risk.

Career Path and Larger Setting

The driving force for the publication stems partly in Burey’s personal work history: multiple jobs across business retail, startups and in international development, viewed through her perspective as a woman of color with a disability. The two-fold position that Burey faces – a push and pull between expressing one’s identity and looking for safety – is the core of the book.

It arrives at a moment of collective fatigue with organizational empty phrases across the US and beyond, as resistance to diversity and inclusion efforts mount, and various institutions are reducing the very frameworks that earlier assured progress and development. Burey delves into that terrain to contend that withdrawing from corporate authenticity talk – that is, the business jargon that trivializes identity as a collection of aesthetics, peculiarities and pastimes, keeping workers preoccupied with handling how they are seen rather than how they are treated – is not an effective response; instead, we need to redefine it on our personal terms.

Minority Staff and the Display of Self

By means of detailed stories and discussions, the author demonstrates how employees from minority groups – individuals of color, members of the LGBTQ+ community, women workers, disabled individuals – soon understand to adjust which persona will “be acceptable”. A weakness becomes a liability and people compensate excessively by striving to seem palatable. The act of “showing your complete identity” becomes a projection screen on which numerous kinds of anticipations are placed: emotional work, revealing details and constant performance of gratitude. In Burey’s words, we are asked to reveal ourselves – but without the safeguards or the reliance to withstand what arises.

As Burey explains, employees are requested to share our identities – but absent the defenses or the reliance to endure what comes out.’

Case Study: Jason’s Experience

She illustrates this situation through the account of an employee, a hearing-impaired staff member who took it upon himself to educate his colleagues about deaf culture and communication practices. His readiness to talk about his life – a gesture of transparency the office often applauds as “sincerity” – for a short time made routine exchanges more manageable. Yet, the author reveals, that improvement was unstable. Once employee changes erased the casual awareness he had established, the culture of access dissolved with it. “All of that knowledge departed with those employees,” he notes wearily. What stayed was the exhaustion of being forced to restart, of being made responsible for an organization’s educational process. From the author’s perspective, this demonstrates to be told to expose oneself absent defenses: to risk vulnerability in a structure that applauds your transparency but declines to formalize it into policy. Sincerity becomes a snare when institutions count on individual self-disclosure rather than institutional answerability.

Literary Method and Idea of Resistance

Burey’s writing is at once lucid and lyrical. She marries scholarly depth with a tone of kinship: an offer for readers to participate, to question, to dissent. According to the author, professional resistance is not loud rebellion but ethical rejection – the effort of rejecting sameness in settings that require gratitude for mere inclusion. To resist, from her perspective, is to interrogate the accounts companies narrate about justice and belonging, and to refuse engagement in customs that maintain unfairness. It may appear as naming bias in a gathering, withdrawing of voluntary “equity” effort, or defining borders around how much of one’s personal life is provided to the organization. Resistance, the author proposes, is an affirmation of personal dignity in environments that frequently praise obedience. It represents a habit of integrity rather than opposition, a way of asserting that one’s humanity is not dependent on organizational acceptance.

Redefining Genuineness

She also refuses inflexible opposites. Authentic does not simply eliminate “authenticity” entirely: rather, she advocates for its restoration. In Burey’s view, sincerity is far from the raw display of individuality that organizational atmosphere frequently praises, but a more deliberate alignment between personal beliefs and individual deeds – a honesty that opposes manipulation by corporate expectations. As opposed to considering sincerity as a requirement to reveal too much or adjust to cleansed standards of transparency, Burey urges followers to preserve the parts of it rooted in honesty, personal insight and moral understanding. According to Burey, the objective is not to abandon genuineness but to relocate it – to move it out of the corporate display practices and into interactions and offices where trust, equity and accountability make {