🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have voted to withdraw from an global treaty designed to protect women from abuse, including family violence, following extensive and intense debates in the parliament.

Several thousand of protesters gathered in the capital this past week to oppose the decision. The final authority now lies with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to endorse or veto the legislation.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only took effect in Latvia last twelve months ago, requiring governments to develop legal frameworks and support services to end all forms of abuse.

Latvia has become the first EU country to begin the procedure of exiting from the convention. Turkey withdrew in 2021, a decision that rights groups characterized as a major setback for gender equality.

Political Controversy and Resistance

The treaty was approved by the EU in 2023, yet conservative groups have argued that its focus on equal rights weakens traditional families and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Latvian parliament, MPs voted 56 to 32 to withdraw from the convention, a move proposed by opposition parties but supported by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a defeat for centre-right government leader Evika Silina, who joined demonstrators outside parliament earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that violence does not triumph," she stated to the assembly.

Ideological Disagreements and Reactions

One of the main parties advocating for the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose head has urged citizens to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

The nation's ombudswoman the rights official appealed for the agreement not to be politicized, while the group the rights organization stated it was "not a threat to national principles, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The Thursday's vote has provoked widespread protest both inside Latvia and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have signed a Latvian appeal calling for the treaty to be preserved. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has announced a demonstration for next Thursday, accusing lawmakers of ignoring the wishes of the Latvian people.

Global Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The leader of the Council of Europe's legislative body stated that the Baltic state had made a rash choice driven by misinformation. He described it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning step backward for female equality and human rights in the continent".

He added that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the convention four years ago, cases of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not achieve a two-thirds majority, the head of state could possibly send back the bill for additional review if he holds objections.

Head of State the national leader announced on social media that he would evaluate the vote according to legal principles, "taking into account governmental and judicial factors, instead of ideological or political viewpoints".

Last week, another member of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, indicated it would not exclude petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a concerning development for women's rights not only in Latvia but throughout the continent," stated a human rights advocate.

• Family violence statistics have been rising in multiple EU countries
• The European treaty mandates specific safeguards for victims of domestic abuse
• The nation's decision could affect similar discussions in additional member states